MSJ
Not me that complained but having read your original post the only thing I can think is that someone high up in the un-named company you work for, supporting the un-named aircraft, may have read it and felt you were in some way attempting to undermine some sort of corporate / commercial protocols.
Reading between the lines of your original post it seemed to me that you perhaps disagreed with the design of the un-named aircraft and, having been perhaps told to get back into your box by your company, were trying to garner support for your views to make your argument with your company stronger.
Quite a few 'perhaps' in there, and a lot of reading between the lines and conjecture from me, but its the best I can suggest!