I'm just saying we might want to wait for more facts before spending 23 pages arguing pros and cons of things that may well have no direct causal connection whatever to this particular accident.
So the reason that this particular aircraft did NOT land on the first or second attempt presumably also had no causal connection with the ultimate crash? It seems rather farcical to call in question the weather conditions (I presume this is your beef?), since clearly this aircraft was not tootling around Cork in a hold pattern for 20 mins for any other reason? What you say above is not incorrect - there have been plenty of aircraft end up on the roof for the reasons you state, but...