Where did SAC claim a 30 minute
run dry capability for the 92? Have I missed it somehow?
[QUOTE]
dynamic components are designed to meet the UH-60 BLACK HAWK ballistic tolerance requirements and all gearboxes are capable of running 30 minutes after loss of oil.[/QUOTE]
you also get a main transmission that ran 3 hours after a massive oil leak,
It did. Did SAC hide the results of another test that failed? Did the FAA ignore that failure if it in fact occurred? Who stamped "OK" on the Test? SAC or the FAA?
Nothing about "Run Dry" said.
How many certification authorities in fact certified the S-92? How many refused to certifiy the S-92?
Why is it the focus is only on SAC?
That is not where the finger should be pointing unless SAC and the FAA for sure are married at the hip! Are they?