For the record, there is little or no correlation between the commercial policies of an airline and the safety of its operations. As one example only; I am in a position to know - as an outsider - that Ryanair's maintenance standards are among the highest in the world. The reason is consistent with all Ryanair's thinking; top-class maintenance saves a fortune by avoiding maintenance-induced delays or diversions, and Ryanair does not knowingly waste money.
It still has dreadful commercial policies and I only submit myself to its treatment of passengers when there is no viable option. But when I do, I'm damn sure I'll get there safely.
On the other hand, there are airlines beset by antediluvian working practices on the flight deck, in the cabin and in the hangar, complacency, who-gives-a-toss attitudes, unreasoning intransigence by unions with an agenda, etc etc. Their cabin staff might speak nicely, and you might even get a free stale sandwich, but I somehow feel less secure than on FR because I know that the organisation is a stranger to the real meaning of "safety culture".