No, not for you Baggers.
I agree about McLuskey being rattled and he did clearly call 'John' a liar, but unfortunately he carried that one off.
As professional as 'john' was in approach, though, he was speaking under an assumed name and was not convincing on membership numbers - I found his 'thousands' response weak.
McLuskey was able to land some very hard hits, e.g. the management stooges attack, as the PCCC is still in the shadows.
Cheap points? Yes, but 5-0 or not, a clear victory in influencing general public opinion in my opinion and a regrettable one.