Here I was thinking that Dick had been arguing long and hard in the past to reduce the amount of airspace towers owned. Something about focusing on the runway, because that is where the risk is (or some such rubbish)? Now, you want a tower to have more airspace- because it's more efficient.
It's really lucky you aren't in a position to make decisions, Dick, because you would be reversing them every time you got held, or some other thing crops up that suits you personally. As evidenced on this thread, even when shown to be wrong, you can't accept it. Crash or crash thru lives on.