At the risk of annoying those who don’t want to hear anything more about it, let me explain what's going on. Without it, I doubt anybody from the outside will have a clue what is going on.
There are now TWO teams working on the transcript. One of them is clearly run by some Kaczynski supporter. That's the source of the alleged new discoveries about pilots trying to do goaround by the book but unable to due to (according to Kaczynski) sabotaged plane. These guys constantly float a lot of newly transcribed (re-transcribed) phrases but never even reference it properly (say by time when these phrases were being spoken). The clear purpose of these is to provide proof that Kaczynski was not at cockpit at the end. Also, all the phrases showing the crew being angry about their predicament are being re-transcribed by them to mean something else.
Example: Where the MAK transcript says "Wkurzy sie jeszcze" (It will only piss him off more" they now say that what really was said was "Chmurzy sie jeszcze" (It is getting more cloudy).
But what is more interesting is the other team that released newly transcribed phrases and even (imagine that) assigned time to them. That's the hot potato because it shows someone new going into the cockpit right around the time when someone important finally decided what to. They are doing an approach instead of going to Minsk or Witebsk (for which they were already writing approach data).
Undeniably, we now have two non-crew characters in the cockpit at the time of the crash. Blasik undeniably is even giving a micro tour of the cocpit, explaning what wing mechanization is for. So Blasik is one, who is the other. Nobody ever answered that. Could it be Blasik entering the cockpit at this time? It was assumed/reported he was in the cockpit prior to that. It was not Kazana because Kazana talked to them prior to that and the entire crew greets clearly new person with "Welcome, welcome". No soldier would greet a general that way. You would think at least the junior officers would say "Mr. General" not "welcome". Besides, Blasik already talked to the PIC extensively before the flight and supposedly there is a video of it, so why would they the PIC greet him another time?
Answer who is the new person at the cockpit and you know what happened. They are waiting for the decision and someone new, clearly important, comes and they instantly know the decision.
Now see what the Kaczynski side is doing. This is his official story on what went on. Count how many lies you can already document.
Source
The plane was on the wrong course, but it could fly away
"The plane took off, with an incorrect forecast about the weather, but we know that the airport does not provide forecasts. He approached the airport at Smolensk, was not warned, the airport was not closed. He got two signals. One - the most important one that he is being guided for landing. And second, from the Polish crew of Yak. That [the weather] was bad but that he could try. Descent into the decision height is normal procedure. With the properly functioning plane and efficient airport service such a thing is not associated with any risk. Even in very difficult conditions. But, as we know today, the crew of the airport was to the largest degree defective, to say the least, and on the other hand, we don’t know if the plane was functioning properly. The ATC crew misled the crew of the aircraft. And this was the result of the decision in Moscow taken somewhere at a high level, who, at the moment, we cannot determine. At the altitude of 100 meters they decided to leave. The rest is a mystery. We know that the plane was on the wrong course. That from this course the plane could not land, but he could lift up and fly away. There was an order to do so, issued by the first pilot , and the second pilot repeated it. The rest still needs to be explained. "
The plane crashed through the fault of the Russians
"The secret is in the wreckage of the aircraft. Is or was, because you know that the wreckage was destroyed. We do not have a huge amount of material. We are dealing with the situation, which is a gigantic scandal resulting from the fault of the Russians. Just as it was their fault that this plane crashed. But this could be the fault of the Polish government. The Polish government did not have to agree to such conditions for carrying out the procedures for the explanation of this terrible disaster. This gives reason to the highest degree of negative evaluation. When I said that Russia was guilty, I talked about the direct fault. Because of the fact that this plane was in a hopeless situation, in fact, encouraged to land. But we have another [party at] fault. There comes to the forefront the basic fault for the separation of the visits. Fault because there was a game played with a foreign power against their own president. The game, which ended in tragedy. In the normally functioning democracy the people responsible for something like this would have nothing to seek/say in politics. "
How would you want to be in the shoes of the guys who have to "document" the story according to Kaczynski? This is why it becomes paramount that MAK releases all the raw data to the public. Otherwise, all the opposing teams will be interpreting/re-interpreting things till doomsday. Are Russians playing politics with this whole thing? Probably. The only way to try to put an end to it is to release all raw data and clear slander by Kaczynski is a very good excuse.
Meanwhile, when asked about why all the Polish aviation and other experts disagree with his take on the events, Kaczynski answered that if he were the Prime Minister, he would have already taken care of these experts by means of "state services". So yes, if this guy was in power, I and countless other Poles would be in prison already. So yes, I am rather pissed off about all this.