... you didn't answer
C Changes question. WHY?
The FAA has not notified a difference in relation to Class C, so they consider the procedures they use in Class C to be control procedures and have the controller responsible for separating aircraft.
Which is not the 'Target Resolution' procedure. You are wrong to suggest so
Disk. In class C in the US, and all other contracting states, IFR are
separated from IFR
and VFR, VFR need not be separated from other VFR, thus the procedure as above. Do you not see the difference between reality (written), and your reality
The Williamtown scenario was not between two VFR was it!? Further, in Sydney the tower 'Separate' where able, using ATC applied 'visual
separation', it is a separation
standard, not a DTI and hope they won't hit, or for that matter
a RADAR DTI Target Resolution procedure ... which again I stress
is not a 'separation standard'.
If a US TRACON controller used target resolution between two IFR or an IFR and a VFR, are you saying that is not going to have them in the office for Tea and Bikkies (not crap el cheapo ones)?