Nothing has changed -- "reconsideration" is NEVER possible (claiming they lack resources to correct blatant errs); and their managers never face any review-checkride, or any investigative "professional-standards" committee.
The predictive words of "reconsideration is Never possible" need some examination here.
If the expert opinion is that critical contributors were overlooked than at the least a petition for rexamination need be made. If that is not disposed in a professional manner than there is room for further collective action.
So please get back to us after a pertition for reconsideration has been made and rejected without foundation and maybe we can do something about it.
Meanwhile thanks for the heads up