My stance is that justice under the rules, and indeed natural justice, does not seem to have been done.
I submit that the qualifications to taking and publicising a legitimate stance are simple:
1. the ability to write and read and understand English. (got the relevant O levels, language and lit. t-shirts)
2. an open mind.
I came to this thread knowing no more than a member of the general public other than being Duty Churchwarden at St Boniface, JHQ, when the appalling news of the disaster broke.
Given that "nobody really knows what happened" (my shorthand of the previos 'n' pages) the extant verdict is insupportable, in my view. Those better qualified than I can argue over technicalities, but such argument, at best, avoids my central issue. Perhaps it is meant to.