Interesting that this badly misused word should come up in a discussion on semantics. You mean supervision - not oversight. And don't go blaming Webster. It's oversight that causes things to be missed.
We're a long way from the OP's question but...
Two basic stages (if not more) in chart compilation...
So, perhaps an oversight on the part of the compiler when transcribing the FAA document into the Jepp document (or in this case, from the FAA team actually putting the original document(s) together in the first place?), which, then, at the various stages of quality control/supervision (call it what you want) further up the editorial heirarchy, were also.....what?
So I'm not sure I understand your distinction.
That sums it up. Nothing else would provide the navigation accuracy required to miss some really high terrain during, and just after, that missed approach turn. It is not nearly as critical for the departure procedures.
With this in mind, the VOR procedure at the same field makes a mockery of this type of justification!
Presumably it is rarely flown in comparison to the LOC?
