I completely agree.What I don,t agree with is the six month term. Perhaps two weeks until blood tests are conclusive etc. Then a further decision can be made. But to ban operations for 6 months "is not justified".
It does not take 6 months for a conclusive diagnosis. In fact a diagnosis and remedy could be achieved within 72 hours.
This a point for regulatory reform, a closer examination of the authority of medical practitioners and questioning the unrestrained authority in our industry and society in general.
At the end of the day the guy fainted.If he earning $10,000 a month and holding a seniority position we have allowed 1 medical examiner to end all that for 6 months for what? What are you going to do in 6 months exactly ?