QANTAS A380 US flights to end?

[I.R.PIRATE]

*
In from the USA
*
Subject: Qantas: Engine Problems Mean Its A380s Can't Fly to the U.S. Big Problem
*


Qantas: Engine Problems Mean Its A380s Can’t Fly to the U.S. Big Problem

By Brett Snyder | December 16, 2010

You’d think that the Qantas A380 saga would be winding down by now,
but you’d be wrong. Qantas is still struggling with the fact that it
can’t operate the A380 to the U.S. because the engines simply can’t
handle it. This means that things continue to get worse for
engine-maker Rolls-Royce, and I imagine legal bills have only started
to pile on. Rolls needs to get this thing under control, because right
now Qantas is in a bad place.

While Singapore and Lufthansa both use the Rolls-Royce Trent 970,
Qantas had to use the 972 to get 2,000 pounds more thrust for its
operation. There actually isn’t much of a difference in the engines at
all, but one is rated to give a little more power. For Qantas, that
little bit extra is really important.
Qantas has re-started flights from Sydney to places like Singapore on
the A380, because it doesn’t need full thrust to operate that route.
However, the prize has always been flights to Los Angeles, and that’s
a different story.

At nearly 7,500 miles, Qantas needs every bit of thrust to get off the
ground at LAX with a full passenger load and a lot of fuel. And that
full thrust requirement is apparently why Qantas is having bigger
engine problems with this airplane than anyone else. Any time you use
full thrust, you put more stress on the engine. Engines are supposed
to handle that just fine, but not in this case.

Qantas has now found that it can operate no more than 75 flights at
top thrust before it needs to replace an engine. That’s ridiculous,
considering each engine can cost $10 million or more. And it leaves
Qantas with a huge problem.

Rolls-Royce had suggested last month that Qantas operate the engines
with less thrust. That suggestion is completely worthless since it
would mean Qantas could carry a mere 80 passengers on the LA to Sydney
route. The airline might as well just operate a 747 at full capacity
for a lot less cost with a lot more passengers. If it can’t carry a
full load on the A380, that airplane is worthless.
The funny thing is that Qantas didn’t even want the more powerful
engines in the first place. It opted for the same ones as Lufthansa
and Singapore originally, but then Airbus announced the A380 would
weigh 5 tons more than planned. That pushed Qantas to order the
higher-thrust engines in order to make the airplane viable on the LA
route.

So now Qantas is stuck between a rock and a hard place. It has A380s
on the property but it can’t fly them where it wants without needing a
multimillion dollar engine change every few months. Rolls-Royce is
going to*have to fix this problem or Qantas is going to have to
find an alternative.

The silver lining for Qantas is that it’s not going to be responsible
for any of the cost here. Rolls-Royce and Airbus (to a lesser extent,
if any), however, are going to have to open up those wallets. For
Qantas, however, it would much rather just have an airplane that
functions properly. Instead, Qantas now has to go through its peak
travel season without the ability to use the A380 to the U.S.

*
*