Surely not , you cant see much from the picture.
I was merely making the general case following the quote above.
Not suggesting that I had any such background.
In actual fact there have been several links to analysis that I find no reason to argue with.
Something that Anatoly Kvotchur said to me one day was "the bigger the aircraft the easier it is to meet the spec" Wise words but they do ignore visual signature and cost.
As to
Wild-@ssed guesses, pure imaginings, and desperate exaggerations designed to support their "the RAAF must buy F-22 only & completely rebuild the F-111" agenda.
I would have thought that a careful read of the introduction to the document referred to makes it very clear it is none of those things as it is full of very sensible caveats.