In an effort to simplify things in this non-flying mind, I re-read #7426, had no trouble understanding it, and came up with these quotes:
Q1. Where a person fails, whether negligent or not, the board should consider the possible human failings of others who placed that person in the situation. So how did the staff at HQ1 Gp meet this requirement?
[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Q2. Who, for example, made the decision to allocate ZD 576 to Aldergrove, and what consideration did he give to the known issues with its serviceability?[/FONT]
[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Q3. Again if I am incorrect please put me right, and tell me what staffing the engineering and airworthiness areas received in 1 Gp?[/FONT]
[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Q4. When did HQ 1 Gp approach DLS for their confirmation that the Gross Negligence verdict was "lawful" and in accordance with the rules?[/FONT]
[FONT='Verdana','sans-serif']Hope that makes things easier. Qs 2 and 4 need only very short factual answers.[/FONT]