TurbineD
My intent was to describe LHT as involved in the retro/repair/upgrade. Their service of the id'd engines that failed/faced failure, is critical to the explanation for the defects. From this explanation an understanding of the events can be acquired. Since non-disclosure of vulnerabilities is reported by Qantas, some apprehension is reasonable as to whether this incident will be fully understood by the Public. What is the nature of the actions taken that now create a reduced possibility of in flight Burst?
What of the year-old AD's?? What was/is being replaced other than the famous 'stub' pipe?? Further, there is the question of disclosure of meaningful concerns by the representatives of the Public?? Is the Mission of the EASA to protect Corporate proprietaries? Or is its Mission to protect the safety of the Public in Carriage??
One hopes the latter.