Skill and ambition are actually very relevant to declining airmanship.
Not only do you have a real comprehension problem, you do it out of context. How unremarkable of you.
Yes, skill is relevant to airmanship. albeit only a part of airmanship. It is not tied to the economics of wages paid, however, and neither is professionalism.
The original poster asserts that professionalism is on the decline, and asserts that airmanship is soon to be ancient history, specific to the wages paid by airlines; furthermore, the original poster asserts, repeatedly and in no uncertain terms that the airlines intentionally hire underqualified and inexperienced airman, and establish lower wages to that end. The intent of the original poster has been stated repeatedly, the posts have been identified, and this is not within the realm of dispute.
The original poster attempted to make his case without citation or reference or quote (an obscure reference to search a forum doesn't count; it's indiscriminate, and not worthy of consideration). Specifically, he attempted to do so by claiming that technical questions are no longer asked, but instead that questions regarding parental consent are the standard and the norm. The original poster lied, and the basis for the thread is a lie. Perhaps you missed this material before.
We'll add your post as #146 to the list of posts that have linked pay with skill and ambition or airmanship, even though TopTup assures us such is not the case (he's searched the thread and can find no reference...other than conveniently missing 19 such posts). Surprise, surprise.