Around minute 37 of the video, when the 3 NG crashes were cited as evidence for the whistleblowers case is the point where the video became nonsense IMO
That's not very fair. All the program attempted to do is ask a question. "Is this evidence?". The questioned was asked because the whistleblowers claimed the planes broke up exactly where the dodgy parts were fitted.
All of the doubting arguments on this thread stink to the high heavens of blind ignorance. The documentary is what it is. If you have a problem with it, then quite simply you have a problem with the whistleblowers and the former FAA officials who are making the claims. I suspect a lot of doubting of this programme is down to nothing more than the fact that it was aired on Al-Jazeera. Wake up and smell the coffee guys, this channel has way more credit than all your networks put together even though 411's friends have tried many times to burn it to the ground.