bearfoil,
I am afraid that I am not at all sure about what you are saying in many of your posts, because, I think, you use a jargon or shorthand with which I am not familiar.
I think I can grasp the following:
So here you demonstrate what is wrong. The verdict is what it is. It has no bearing on the larger issue, that of Safety in the Industry. Left to its own devices, the Industry will recover quickly and inexpensively from an event that happened ten years ago.
The point of my posts is that safety in the industry is a matter for the industry. National laws have a responsability to determine how people lost their lives, if that is the outcome of a failure of safety in the industry.
I am not at all sure I understand your emboldened "inexpensively".
Cost should not be a factor in this kind of incident.