sorry mountain bear I disagree
The only reason you want the company liable is to extract more dollars even if the situation actually results in more deaths.
Therefore there is a fundamental difference between us. I am seeking the best method of preventing future accidents you are seeking the best way to screw more dollars and whether an event takes place or not is largely irrelevant.
A company is not best placed as it rarely understands the complicated daily business going on around it. This is left to the employee to deal with. Therefore my opinion remains shared responsibility and aligns with the regulations I quoted.
Companies have responsibilities, individuals have responsibilities. To suggest a company is responsible for the actions of an individual who knowingly and irresponsibly ignored approved procedures is nonsense.