PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - 380?
Thread: 380?
View Single Post
Old 14th Dec 2010, 17:44
  #38 (permalink)  
cxorcist
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"JFK in a -8I never on the cards"

Once again, Eyes Only, you are incorrect. I had an in-person conversation with a director level executive in which we spoke about the -8I. They were most definitely looking at it for the JFK route. He said that they would be very interested in using for JFK if it could make the return with full pax, bags, and cargo. The fact that it cannot, he explained, makes the airplane much less attractive overall. Think about it, why would you not want to consider a larger aircraft when we are about to increase to 3 flights a day there? Of course the -8 should be considered.

And you accuse me of spreading "misinformation"...

BTW... Same director said the A380 is "a horrible airplane" and not being considered anymore despite what is being said publicly.

I still think the -8I has a chance to replace some -400s in CX (especially for the high density EUR routes), but the company will likely wait until they see how the freighter does and whether or not the plane has a chance to be made lighter before they make any commitments.

PS - I too like 4 engined airplanes!!!
cxorcist is offline