ChristiaanJ
Originally Posted by Iron Duck
Does anyone else fancy having a pop at the pre-existing fire theory?
I already did earlier....
Without any physical proof at all of such a fire, we only have a few highly contradictory "witness reports".
I should have made myself clearer and said "does anyone else fancy having a pop at
postulating a pre-existing fire theory?"
I'm with you and PBL on this one, and I'm only an interested SLF. Nonetheless, after PBL so beautifully skewered the "airworthiness" argument, the only possible remaining challenge to the the BEA report and the Court's conclusions might come from a pre-existing fire theory, as advanced by CAL.
Genghis Khan (alledgedly) said: "It's not enough just to win. The other side have to
know that they have lost." Perhaps I'm being mischievous, but that's why I'm asking for any further theories. Let's see if they fly.