How well was she tracking? Who could possibly defend the CAL "mechanic"? I meant no disrespect for this verdict at all, on the contrary, it seems to have satisfied at least one contingent, and as I say, the Titanium blunder is indefensible. I do not even rue amateur "partisanship", it is the stuff of discussion. What irks me is the level to which some would take their devotion. A product of Human interaction is not a basic of the Laws of Physics. Eh?
Courts produce Opinions. Enforceable Opinions. They have Power, which is seductive to many people, but should not encourage "fans". Courts are only one step above "Elections". IMO.
Observer only, and I know my place.
bearfoil