JP
Do come off it. Given MoD have freely admitted information was concealed (hard to deny it when it has been made public under FoI, or was that forgery), then if there was no conspiracy (as you claim) you must be saying only one man was responsible. And as Hansard records who issued the Release to Service which did not contain vital safety information, that narrows it down somewhat.
Name please. Or, to avoid upsetting my friend Beagle, just give us the post title. Then step back and see if he's happy taking sole blame. I'm not sure he'll be happy at you highlighting his role.