But one must also ask if any other union has had a group of its own members dining on the fruit from the poisonous tree (i.e. advancing as others retired at 60), only to complain that the fruit was poisonous when it came their turn to step away from the table.
I wouldn't have put it that way, but yes there has been right here at Air Canada...CUPE. Their response could not have been more different than ACPA's, and it is for the express reason that they have a duty to fairly represent all members as stated in their newsletter regarding this issue.
Other unions in this country also have dealt with the same issue (ACPA is not the centre of the universe afterall) and they too have seniority systems.
Please explain why it is OK for ACPA, and ACPA alone to ignore their legal obligations?