Originally Posted by 767-300ER
I think you'll find that the MOA was signed with a "no prejudice" caveat....it means squat to anyone else...
Frankly, I have no idea how a "no prejudice" caveat, whatever that is, changes the fact that the MOA resulted in no benefit to us because it was not only rejected by the two pilots that it was intended to affect, but its objectives were totally frustrated by the Tribunal order giving them precisely what the MOA was designed to prevent them from having.
It did, however, generate a lot more legal expenses for us, and it may have opened the door to further intrusions by government bodies into the workings of our union and the management of our collective agreement. A total fiasco.
If it means "squat" to everyone else, why are we facing a four-day hearing before the CIRB to deal with it, and what is that going to cost us, both financially and otherwise?