JP,
Forgive me if I have misunderstood but your 5301 is YOUR interpretation of the allegations which have been made by various posters on this thread. You have used YOUR words and then challenged Chugalug to agree with each of YOUR statements. (Good barrister cross examination technique, by the way)
In 6473, Tuc has put those "allegations" into his own words and, in my view, has done so rather well.
From the evidence available to most of us it is difficult to be certain that YOUR Points 4 & 5 are correct. On the other hand, there is probably more evidence that they are true than there is that Tapper and Cook were guilty of gross negligence. Regards.