PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Chinook - Still Hitting Back 3 (Merged)
View Single Post
Old 18th Nov 2010, 14:04
  #7017 (permalink)  
dervish
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: W. Scotland
Posts: 652
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
John Purdey

With all due respect, when you first raised the 5 points you list above, I recall someone replied that there was no need for 5. (a whistleblower) because the facts confirming the other 4 spoke for themselves (or words to that effect).

I read with great interest some recent posts discussing lack of proper clearances for the aircraft. I think it would be very foolish for anyone to make such a statement unless it could be supported. I have no direct experience of such work but I do know there are very strict regulations governing it. MoD has a "history" here and a poor one at that. For you to describe the statement as "nonsense" must mean you have evidence MoD implemented the regulations to the letter. I respectfully suggest you are mistaken, or have been misled, if only because of Boscombe's well documented advice that the software was unverifiable.
dervish is offline