It will be interesting to see what the Supreme Court has to say about that. What happens if they decide that it is permissible for a group of employees to collectively and democratically decide they wish to retire at a specific age, like 62, or 55, or 60, or whatever?
It's amazing to me that after all this time there is still this kind of fundamental misunderstanding of what this issue is all about. It is already permissible for a group of employees to collectively and democratically decide when they wish to retire at a certain age, like 62, or 55, or 60 or whatever. Furthermore no one wishes to change that.
What is
not permissible now is for a group of employees to collectively decide when someone
must retire. That is an infringement on individual human rights in Canada. Can you not see the difference?