Vocational route vs Academics - research thread
I'm conducting a little research for my teacher training degree: I would like to know what your opinions are regarding the two main routes of entry to the EASA Pt66 B1 license.
1: Academic - HE College in an aircraft engineering specific college (2 yrs), followed by 2 years in an EASA pt147 Academy studying for the license exams, followed by a minimum of 2 years experience in a part 145 company as a mechanic.
2: Vocational - Apprenticeship or direct entry into a part 145 company, minimum 5 years experience, and EASA modules taken as self-study (license by post)
In your opinions, what makes for the easiest route?
Is an academic route candidate given the same level of respect as a vocational entrant?
Which route will provide a 'better' class of engineer in 5-10 years?
Which do employers prefer to see on the CV?
Personally, I have done both... I joined the RAF as an apprentice, and when I left, went to a part 147 Academy. I contracted for a couple of years as a mechanic, but never applied for the license - I became a teacher instead...
I know what some people will say, but I welcome the views of all..