DV
Thank you. Your selective quoting of the SofS & QQ reports without the required context proves my point more perfectly than I could hope.
You appear unaware of the significance of the inconsistency between the 2007 and 2009 reports, why it is there, and why it further helps prove my point.
A lot of the mud was, IMO, unwarranted. It is debateable whether the HC report alone would have cast a big enough shadow over MRA4 to undermine its future, or whether the overall campaign, Times articles and SNP sniping (stoked by many on here) made a significant further impact. We'll probably never know.
DV: First of all a BIG SORRY to those who want this to be a pure MRA 4 thread, but I do believe that it is important that JFZ 90's points are addressed
This statement is so arrogant and patronising.
To be clear, you haven't addressed my points, you've proved them!
I'll leave you to your armchair.