PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Future Carrier (Including Costs)
View Single Post
Old 19th Oct 2010, 18:33
  #2812 (permalink)  
GreenKnight121
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: by the Great Salt Lake, USA
Posts: 1,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wrathmonk
I thought the F35 had no AD role as such (other than it's own self protection as it 'fought' its way in and out)
One of the required performance items for F-35 (since it is the F-16 replacement for the USAF and F/A-18A/C replacement for the USN/USMC) was always to "equal or exceed the air-to-air capabilities of current models of F-16* aircraft".

The reports from the evaluations of the program indicate that it has indeed "exceeded" the A-A capabilities of the aircraft it is designed to replace.

Funny that.


* you know, the aircraft much of NATO and many other nations in the world currently rely on as their primary AD fighter (as well as A-G striker)?

Which much of NATO is planning to replace with F-35, which will become their new primary AD fighter (as well as A-G striker)?
GreenKnight121 is offline