How to read a
PR
In the interest of transparency, BEA has failed miserably, and for reasons well discussed here. In any search for conclusions,
intent is paramount; it is also the driving force of our legal system. As a benchmark, the authority will ordinarily aim high, to deflect criticism, especially from invested parties.
An out of balance motivation is easily identified: Who stands to "win", who will "lose"?
In issuing presumptive statements, BEA tipped its hands from the outset, and precious little has been done to rectify the impression of bias.
The damage has been done, and partisanship (bias) sullies the potential to recapture credibility.
It must be noted that the complaints derive from an involved party(s); BEA should have expected this. Communication is paramount; failing that, "faux" communication is an insuperable hurdle.
bear