It's a great idea, but I think Tinstaafl has identified a crucial problem - how to demonstrate that this training system is better (and to what degree) that the current system. I'm afraid that this proof will fall to you, aviation being the industry it is.
To gather the evidence, you will need to:
1. give away a large number of these devices to any schools who will take the idea on as an experiment.
2. wait a long time to see whether the accident statistcs for those people who trained using the deivce are different from the those who did not.
This appears to place an intolerable burden on your capitalisation/time to market. What do you think?