I was going to let this go but a bottle of vino says otherwise. (well, it is the weekend!) Look, let me make this simple for you.
1) You DID ask a question.
2) You THEN followed it up with a statement. So, please don't try to pull the wool over my eyes. Please allow me to make a few observations.
Firstly, if there havn't been any incidents to report, does this mean then that we've all been good boys and girls or, does it mean that despite a few recent 'events', the Company has decided to take a more measured response for once. Knowing what a disaster Manchester was, it realises that despite your final comment, to attract the calibre of people required to fulfil it's expansion plans, it really does need to start making an effort. Anyway, I guess good news will never travel as fast as bad, eh?
Secondly, please answer my original question that was posed to you. How should the Company 'tell' its pilots that they are not going to continue with punitive action and that trust is something they realise is lacking. My question still stands and you havn't answered it yet.
Finally, I have to disagree with most of your post anyway. I stand by what I said in my earlier post. I guess the positive responses indicate i'm not alone in my view. If people insist on filing these pointless ASR's to cover their arses, they really should be asking themselves whether this is the job for them, let alone the Company!
Harry