PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Aircraft Control and Barber Pole
View Single Post
Old 3rd Oct 2010, 02:19
  #35 (permalink)  
GR53
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Washington DC
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Don't forget, this group of pilots also believe that the aircraft was remote piloted into the tower.
Which begs the question - if the Pilots who are members of the Pilots for 9/11 Truth Club say it is too difficult/impossible for even THEM to hit the towers in a 767 traveling at 470 knots, why they believe it would be easier for a remote-controlled aircraft to hit the towers, what with the inherent data-link latency and restrictions of that technology in 2001, one can only scratch their head over.

So, they claim these were "beefed-up" aircraft, structurally and engine-wise with remote-controlled capabilities added to the airframe.

Which takes us back to the opening post's question - "Aircraft Control and Barber Pole." If "Ralph", who is most assuredly XXXXXXX, ever comes back, I would like him to answer the question if conventional pilots could not control an aircraft at those speeds, what makes him think a remote-controlled one would, with a modified or-not 767?

Methinks XXXXX won't be back to answer.
GR53 is offline