It is interesting (I use the word loosely
) to read here the speculation about the Concorde crash, much of it introduced and indeed resolved within a few years of the crash. I guess if unfounded speculation doesn't succeed the first time around, one can always wait 6 or so years and then reintroduce it.........
It prompted me to read again the analysis by Bernd Sieker, in his Diplom thesis at
http://www.rvs.uni-bielefeld.de/publ...lom/sieker.pdf (the second half; the first half describes a causal-analysis SW toolset which has been superseded by the SERAS suite).
Contributing to this analysis was an exchange of information and views with the Chief Aerodynamicist of Concorde at the time of service introduction.
PBL