So at worst all i need to convert isnt my ATP to an ATP but for EASA purposes a PPL IR
. But, to add a MPA type rating to an EASA PPL, you will need to have passed the ATPL exams, so what's the advantage?
From Article 7.4 of the latest FCL Draft
Aeroplane or helicopter type ratings may be issued to holders of Part-FCL licences and associated ratings or certificates that comply with the requirements for the issue of those ratings established by a third country.
Such ratings will be restricted to aircraft registered in that third country.
I interpret this as meaning that whilst someone in Pace's position will need an EASA licence and IR, the Type Rating may be added purely on the basis of the 3rd country TR.
However, the Basic Regulation says you have to comply with all the EASA regs, it doesn't say you just have to get a PPL. If you want to get paid in an operation requiring compliance with EASA FCL, you will need an EASA CPL. In practice, this means the ATPL exams, since the sum of the CPL and IR exams is probably a bit more work.
brgds
421C