This is now way off track from the original intent of the post, for that I apologise. LCCs can use far less experienced pilots now because at first glance, they are easier to fly using automation, fbw and modern aircraft systems. Have a look in the cockpit of a Super Connie and ask whether a 200 hr co-pilot would be useful. Easy Jet, Ryanair and many others use this technology to keep their passengers safe while driving down their cost base by out sourcing training and employing low experience pilots, amongst other things. Their CEOs suggest that they only need one pilot, the Stewardess' can help if a non-normal requires. With the outsourcing of training and the pay to fly style of endorsement comes poor training. Why would it be different if there is no 'buy in' to the positive results from a training course. Does it matter if the candidate has only a superficial knowledge of the system he or she is being endorsed on?
Captain Sullenberger spoke at length about crew experience and the changes that are now constant in the industry.