PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Mega Merged: REX Recruitment/Cadetship and Working for REX
Old 20th Sep 2010, 06:18
  #510 (permalink)  
swh

Eidolon
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Some hole
Posts: 2,179
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by KRUSTY 34
What you have quoted is a direct copy of the original 2007 ATOG proposal! A proposal!!!
That is the law, CAR 5.40 and CAO 82.3, they are not proposals.

Originally Posted by KRUSTY 34
Putting taxiing aside, one of the functions of the pilot in command at REX is the starting of engines. Only qualified Captains or candidates under the instruction of Check and/or Training Captains are allowed to start engines. Line captains are not permitted to allow anyone (except themselves of course) to start engines QED!
Which bit of "can be performed from a co-pilot’s seat, either directly or by instruction" do you not understand ?

Nothing requires the PIC to occupy a pilot station, in larger operations, check captains are often in the jump seat, with a captain and first officer in the pilot stations. It is totally possible in such a situation for the first officer to log ICUS in the RHS, and the captain co-pilot time in the LHS, and the check captain command time from the jump seat if that what the operator designated.

A co-pilot can state an instruction to the PIC, e.g. "start engine 1". A person conducting ICUS does not physically have to manipulate every control, switch, dial etc.

It is also very common in many airlines that only the captain sets the thrust, and has their hands on the thrust levers until V1. It is totally acceptable for the purpose of conducting ICUS for the first officer to instruct the captain to "set thrust" if that is their SOP. Other examples, setting the bugs on the left hand instruments, DH on the radalt, QNH/standard on the standby, flight control and brake checks.

Again, your statements are not supported by the law.

Originally Posted by KRUSTY 34
This is just one example of why the ATOG proposal, that you spuriously put up as regulation has not been applied.
CASAComs are not ATOG proposals.

"The CASA Communication (CASACom) publication, previously known as the Air Transport Communication (ATCom), has been developed to allow the Civil Aviation Safety Authority to promptly communicate identified safety and operational issues to all Air Operator Certifcate holders."

There are 13 CASAComs currently published, all available online on the CASA website. CASACom 01/09/0 is a controlled document, and "remains current until re-issued, withdrawn or superseded."

Originally Posted by KRUSTY 34
It was a cynical and self serving attempt to justify a practice for the benefit of CASA's mates in the industry, and it was exposed as the flawed document it is!
The document is totally in line with ICAO Annex 1, it is also the way other countries do ICUS (P1 U/S).
swh is offline