There is a little too much misinformation on this thread by now... Let's not agree on things that are not factual. This is a rather straightforward event, and there is no need to confuse matters with misconceptions and false "facts".
Sounds great to read, but let's be careful about distinguishig accepted facts from analysis in a report.
In my view anything to do with the actual performance of the aircraft is "analysis" based on facts (e.g. DFDR, radar tracks, etc.). Many other conclusions in the report are also not facts but analysis.
It is not uncommon for the parties to an investigation to accept most facts but disagree on the conclusions based on analysis of these facts.