AirfixPilot
Is your true name Wratten? Or perhaps Day? Whatever, I think you should re-read the reports - THEN read the HoL enquiry findings. It is THAT enquiry which takes into account the other two and the findings they reached show that they were wrong. By NOT reading the Hol enquiry your view will certainly be blinkered.
Why pick on ONE single item to 'support your argument'? It's relevance is not the sole factor. Many more have come to light that were not in the original reports.
A quick check back will get you to the Hol findings. But if you wait a few seconds I suspect the link will magically appear!