Originally Posted by
bast0n
Flipster
Well said!
And the opposite - politely put - is
Sadly, I sincerely doubt that Flipster and his friends will ever be swayed to agree with those who offer alternative explanations but, at least, they now seem to accept the possibility of such alternatives; which is advancement indeed. Bravo all!
Baston,
What a silly ill thought out post that is
Take a stroll back through the whole of the thread and you will find folk who have clearly stated in here that what JP and the AM's have suggested is quite probably what did happen on that day.
To try and state that what they suggest
definitely did not happen would be ludicrous, wouldn't it?
The differences we have is that most of us also accept that there are other credible possibilities which may have caused the crash which, with the lack of eye witness, ADR and CVR evidence means the verdict reached is unjust.