PPRuNe Forums - View Single Post - Why no helo transport? Are we condemning our diggers to an easy victimology?
Old 21st Aug 2010, 11:56
  #2 (permalink)  
Hydraulic Palm Tree
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Down Under
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Helo's at low-level are sufficiently safe if escorted by gunships. Whenever we did people-sniffers in Vietnam at ultra low-level we had gunships in 2 click trail and all it took was a smoke-pop and an R/T call to deter the gooks from taking potshots or engaging you with LAW's or RPG's. They eventually found it wiser to keep their heads down. Escorted helos at low-level using terrain-hugging and nap-of-the-earth masking techniques have the distinct advantage of their tracking and destination being indeterminate and time precious - as far as the opposition is concerned. Courtesy of modern NVG'ss you can do it night and day. Contrast that tactic to a foot-slogger patrol heading fortress outbound in daylight on a known tracking with an obvious objective. Chalk and cheese.
.
The Taliban are not gooks and don't care about dying. I am not sure how you conclude that helos are safe at low-level.....

Even if MANPADS come into the equation, very few of these are effective against low-level helos and they'd be easily engaged by follow-up supportive gunships. Contrast this effective quid pro quo against the current nil cost to the insurgents of simply detonating an IED from a safe hidey-hole.
You are very wide of the mark........too late for gunships when the Stinger RMP has taken the side off the aircraft.

Things have moved in........

HPT
Hydraulic Palm Tree is offline