I'll make this last comment and then give everyone a break by letting it drop ;-)
All of my comments to now have been related to a general company. In the case of BAA (and to a lesser extent BA) the potential damages that could be caused by a militant few and an apathetic many will extend to many innocent third party companies and their customers including all the airlines and many others who operate in and out of their airports.
What seems wrong to me is the ability to be held harmless while causing untold damages to others across international borders just by being a member of a union and simply sitting on your backside!
If the law has given you this level of power then would it not be reasonable for it to ask you to have to lift your wrist and tick a box before being able to wreak liability free havoc on this scale?
Last edited by Phil Rigg; 13th Aug 2010 at 17:36.