Point is, you keep making statements like "given this factual information" but of course it isn't "given" nor is it "factual" in any way. It is merely supposition and flawed supposition at that.
Simple truth of the matter is that the RAF most certainly did have nukes, after a shaky start and a slow introduction. If the history of the RAF's nuclear weaponry had been any different then the documentation outlining this period would say so. It isn't secret any longer and of course there's absolutely no reason to imagine that any "dark forces" have somehow re-written history, not least because there would be no reason to do it. You have to ask yourself why - fifty years later - the British Government would even care about such matters. If the truth had been in any way different, it would be clear for all to see in the records at Kew.
Like so many fascinating conspiracy theories, I think you ought to accept that there is no conspiracy, and any pundits or writers who try to suggest otherwise are simply wasting your time and intelligence, peddling half-baked theories to make a fast buck or feed their psychological disorders.
Last edited by Tim McLelland; 13th Aug 2010 at 09:43.