If there is one thing that galvanises member support, is when the mother union tries to impose its will against elected reps.
In normal circumstances I may agree with that statement. In this case however if their (some CC) perceived attacks on the reps by BA management hasn’t managed to galvanise support I don’t imagine it happening because the mother union insists some rules are followed.
I’m far from certain that many CC could actually name more than one or two of the reps and even then those names they do know may be known for the wrong reasons!