The CHRT is the body constituted to decide these very matters. Holding out hope that a higher authority will overturn what's already been decided, especially considering how provincial, territorial and now the federal government views it is unrealistic at best. In the case of ACPA it is irresponsible because they continue to systematically discriminate against more people every single month despite last August's ruling. I would have thought at the very least they would try to mitigate their potential liability until they've exhausted their last legal delaying tactic by asking guys if they want to retire, but instead they continue on as if the ruling never existed.
Is that smart?