Turbo, “ the list of topics contained in EU-OPS is irrelevant. ”
I had overlooked the ‘recurrent’ point; I agree with you.
“ training development ”.
I would not have considered the design aspect to be of significance, particularly in any regulatory document (accreditation) which at best might only enhance the requirement. However, if there is a wide range of interpretations of CRM as I fear, then guidance for the design (content) of the initial training would help, but the content should available from other documentation, e.g. UK CAA CAP 737. What remains is how to put the content together and in context.
A major problem in EASA land, is that the regulator either does not see a need for guidance, on this or other subjects, and where good reference and guidance materials are created by national authorities they are not endorsed by EASA.
“…for captains to be CRM mentors will require a significant shift in attitude and a raising of standards ”
Thus this is a significant challenge for the regulator and operators, and perhaps delineates ‘low safety’ operators from the others.
Perhaps this is the ‘where next’ for CRM - a learning culture.