Why do you think I was implying that the BA management should have ''backed away?"
Just interested, as I did not say nor mean that.
Offering staff travel back did not exactly do the job, did it?
Neither am I paid anything like the big bucks the BA top team draws, so I don''t feel any inclination to declare what they should have done.
I just don't see how one is too impressed with execs who allow an industrial dispute to roll on for many months, whilst the brand is suffering colateral damage.
Just my two cents, don't really care whether you agree and acknowledge your right to have a differing opinion.